You are a brand new show on a basic cable channel. Instead of being compared to Auction Hunters or Parking Wars, your benchmark is a show on the largest broadcaster in ..... the world. Top Gear has had a decent budget and eight years to perfect their craft.
BBC World Headquarters
The History Channel Headquarters
They started with hosts that were fairly well known and they had a clear vision of what they wanted. The cinematography is on par with anything Hollywood has to offer. Their choice of music is sublime; it often has a cheeky tangential connection to what is being discussed. Most importantly they had a clear vision of what they wanted. There was also time for them to develop organically. Segments were expanded or dropped; there was even a host that was replaced. Much of this happened while it was just another car show. There is a lot of freedom when you are not in the spotlight.
Because Top Gear has a large and loyal fan base there was a lot of internet chatter long before your show ever started to film. It was going to be on NBC, it was going to be hosted by Jay Leno or Adam Carolla. Was there going to be a Stig? Would it be the same Stig? The biggest threads seemed to be that there was no way that any copy would be anywhere as good as the original Top Gear. Once people have decided that they don’t like something, even before they have seen it, you have an incredibly tough job convincing them they were wrong.
So far I have seen exactly one episode of Top Gear USA. It is the one with the “moonshine challenge”. I would have watched them all but the History Channel‘s website has been a little wonky and there are not any channels carrying it in Canada.
I don’t really know the hosts yet. There is the Kevin Smith looking guy, who is apparently from the south, the guy from New Jersey who sounds vaguely like Joe Pesci and the drifting guy. It will take a while to learn their personalities. We saw a flash of potential when they were reviewing the new Mustang performance package. One of them loved it and the other was very critical of it. This was very reminiscent of the Top gear we know and love. Do more of this. The audience is afraid that you will be too scared to give an honest appraisal of a car unlike our British friends.
Who are these guys?
I was disappointed with the cheap car challenge. The challenges are some of my favourite parts of Top Gear. You missed a pivotal part of the traditional Top Gear Challenges. The guys were sent out to buy cars for $ 1000 but, unlike the British version, they were not given the theme. We are used to the hosts being told they are going to drive to a certain location or prove a certain point. From what the audience was shown, the guys were not told what the objective was until they had purchased the cars. This made it a little less interesting as there was less justification for their choices. It was also a little weird that while we are still trying to figure out who is who, two of the hosts were wearing plaid shirts, unless this is the Top Gear USA uniform.
Somebody forgot their checked shirt
It was a little odd that there seemed to be no reference to the original Top Gear show. There were things that a Top Gear fan would recognise but things like the Stig may be a little odd for somebody who is new to the brand. The studio audience didn’t seem to know what to make of the hosts bickering. Maybe there should be some sort of warm up act to draw the audience in.
There are a couple of changes that could make a world of difference:
I think your best value for money and time would be to introduce the Top Gear Cool Wall. It is so cheap to do. All you need is a wall segmented in to “Seriously Un Cool”, “Un Cool”, “Cool”, ”Sub Zero” and some pictures of cars. The audience learns a lot about the hosts as they debate where the cars should sit.
Very entertaining, good value for money
Expand the news segment. It is a great opportunity for the hosts to debate and inject some humour in to the show.
Reference the British show. It would help to explain things like the Stig, well as much as he can be explained.
I want to like this show. I like the idea of seeing more cars that are applicable to my world. We don’t see many Peugeots or Austin Marinas here in North America. The original Top Gear is known for dropping pianos on Austin Marinas. I would like to see the USA boys doing something similar with the North American equivalent, the K-car.
Marina about to be crushed by a piano
One Klassy K-car
It is unfair that you are being compared to the original Top Gear. In reality it should be compared to the almost unwatchable Motorweek. No offence to the men and women who made this show but it is awful. Everything on Motorweek is presented in the most scripted and wooden way. They have also never reviewed a car that they didn’t love. It can be hard. All of these shows walk a fine line. If they are too critical the manufacturers might not let them play with their toys. If they are not critical enough their opinion is worthless.
In short, keep up the good work guys. I don’t think you have the recipe exactly right yet. You have all the components. As you work together you will get more comfortable, less of the show will have to be scripted and the more natural it will feel. Keep working the mix and, if they give you enough time, you’ll figure it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment